Business Models, Recessions, & Digital Piracy

28 05 2010

Yesterday, I attended the quarterly comScore State of the U.S. Online Retail Economy webinar for Q1 2010.  First the good news, after a poor 2009 the online retail business in the U.S. is rebounding nicely.

  • Q1 online U.S. retail sales were up 10% Y/Y in the first quarter.
  • This was a nice recovery from negative 2% for the full year in 2009.
  • It’s also worth noting that while online retail declined in 2009, the decline percentage was less than the overall decline in retail.

Compared to the same quarter a year ago all but two segments of the 14 online retail segments comScore covered were showing strong  or moderate growth.  The two segments that actually declined were:

  • Event tickets
  • Computer software

Clearly, these two segments are suffering from more than just the normal effects of the economic cycle.  Both of these segments also are dealing with the issue of digital piracy.  Let’s take a look at Live Events.

It’s no secret that the sales of music CDs have been declining for several years.

Recorded music sales

Source: Enders Analysis

The increase in digital sales has not offset the loss in physical sales.  In the music business, artists have been fighting back by employing new business models to offset the loss of revenue in recorded CDs.  See NYT article.

  • First, they increased ticket prices at live events.  In 1996 the average price of a Top 100 tour ticket was $26.  Today it is $63, up 140%
  • Some of this increase is straight ticket price increases.
  • Much more of this increase is due to VIP packages where fans pay more for premium seats, band collectables, and even band member access.

For a time, this approach worked.  During 2009, while revenues were down in most industries and very negative in recorded music, the live music industry actually managed to eke out a slight revenue increase.  It looks like this will not be the case in 2010. In addition to the comScore numbers we are seeing signs of weakness in other areas.  See NYT article.

  • U2 is delaying their summer tour.  They have a good excuse – Bono is recovering from back surgery.
  • Cristina Aguilers has put off 20 shows, claiming “a busy schedule.”
  • Rolling Stone reports weak sales for Tom Petty, and Lilith, Rihanna.
  • The Eagles, traditionally a big draw, have had to cancel some dates.
  • Several other sources tell of cancelled shows and re-jiggered schedules.

The net of all this is that the new business models being employed by artists seem to be coming into conflict with the realities of the current recession and levels of unemployment in the U.S.  No matter how much fans want to attend these live events, they just can’t afford it.

The revenue damage will not be limited to the music business.  Similar things are happening in the other category that declined in Q1, computer software.  The next business to be hit will be Book Publishing.  Now that book content is available as bits over the Internet, they will be subject to exactly the same economic and cultural forces that are driving down revenue for music and software.  People in the book publishing industry had better be looking hard at new business models to offset the inevitable revenue declines to come.





Google Tablet Details This Week?

12 05 2010


PC World reports that Verizon will reveal more details
on a rumored Google Tablet computer later this week.  There has been speculation for some time that Google would launch a product in response to the Apple iPad and that it would run the Anroid OS, not Google Chrome.

I also just saw that Rob Enderle published a blog with his reasons he things Google should scrap Chrome OS.





Microsoft Office: Competing with Free

12 05 2010

Yesterday, Microsoft officially launched Microsoft Office 2010.  At the same time they announced a free version of Office that will be available in the cloud.  The free version is clearly meant to counter the inroads that Google is making on the office productivity software market with Google Docs.  International Data Corporation (IDC) took a poll of IT users in July 2009
and found that:

  • 97% of enterprises had at least one version of Microsoft Office in house.
  • 19.5% had at least one version of Google Docs, up from only 5.8% the previous year.

Microsoft Office is still clearly the overwhelming market leader.  It is the main part of Microsoft’s $19 Billion Business Division, delivering 1/3 of Microsoft’s revenue and about 1/2 of Microsoft’s net profit.  Yesterday’s announcement was a clear indication that Microsoft it taking the challenge from Google very seriously.  Google claims that 19 million users have signed up for Google Docs.  I would assume that the number of active Google Docs users is something less than that, but it is still significant.

From a business model point of view the free online version of Microsoft Office is a risk for Microsoft:

  • Offering a free version will undoubtedly cannibalize some of their existing $19 billion in revenue.  The question is: how much?
  • Will the increase in new users offset the loss in existing paying users who opt to use the free version of Office 2010 instead?
  • Will a free cloud-based version of Office counter the threat from Google, or will it legitimize the cloud-based computing model and help Google?

It’s a classic Innovator’s Dilemma problem.  Microsoft had to act.  Doing nothing would have meant that Google would slowly eat away at Microsoft’s Office market share over time.  Doing something will keep them in the game, but at what cost?  Microsoft says that the free version of  Office due to ship “later this Summer” will be made available on an ad-supported revenue model.  Google says it has “no current plans” to include advertising on their free Google Docs offering.

I’m going to be teaching a class in MBA level Marketing at the University of San Francisco this coming Fall.  Looking at the latest chapter of Kotler’s “Framework for Marketing Management,” the gold standard for marketing for decades, the chapter on Pricing does not mention pricing for free.    There is a whole new world order out there that is disrupting Marketing and business models in general:

I am really looking forward to teaching the “Five Ps” this Fall!

In the meantime, Microsoft has a serious business problem.  Google is disrupting their biggest and most profitable business division with a series of moves:

  • A free version of their office software.  Google doesn’t claim to have all the features of Microsoft Office, just those that most people use every day.
  • Truly free: no advertising.  At least for now.
  • A cloud-based computing model.  This has several advantages:
    • Designed with collaborative use in mind.
    • Available from any browser on any computer or handheld.  Anything that can run a browser.
    • Files are stored in the cloud.  No worrying about backup or where you left a file.

Microsoft truly has no option but to cannibalize their own existing product line.  Either they do it, or somebody else will.  To Microsoft’s credit, they appear to be making the rights sorts of moves.  On the other hand, Google is not sitting still either.  In March, Google acquired DocVerse, a company that makes it easier to move files to the cloud and to collaborate.

Every move Google makes costs them nothing and gains them market share in a new market for them.  Every move Microsoft makes will eat into their existing revenues and profits.  This is shaping up to be a difficult and disruptive battle.

There is a truly huge market opportunity at stake here, but this battle is just beginning.





Latest Android Stats Do Matter

11 05 2010

PC Week is reporting that for the first time the volume of Android devices sold surpassed the volume of iPhone devices for the quarter.  The article goes on to minimize the victory because the Android devices have been moved through a variety of methods including deep discounts and buy-one-get-one-free offers.

PC week likens this to Prince drive up his CD sales stats by giving a free CD to everybody who purchased a ticket to a live performance.

There is one big difference here: A CD is not a platform.

The reason the Android numbers matter is because this is a platform war:

  • More platforms in the marketplace means more developers
  • More developers means more applications and more innovative applications
  • More platforms means developers develop for your platform first

Developers don’t care how you moved the platforms.  They just want to develop for the platform that will provide the biggest economic opportunity for them and that comes down to pure volume.

As I have written before, this is a battle to be the focus of innovation for the intelligent, handheld device market.  Google is gaining fast, but the war is far from over.





HP Scraps Tablet Computer

1 05 2010

In an update to the Platform Wars discussion yesterday, HP announced that it was scrapping its newest tablet computer product and going back to the drawing board.  There are many news articles about this today, but the main reason given is that the Windows 7 OS was not competitive with products already in the market  such as Apple iPad.  The product issues include:

  • Weight
  • Performance
  • Battery life.  Nowhere near the 7-10 hour battery life of the iPad.

Note that HP does have other tablet PCs on the market today, but it is only the newest on that has been scrapped.

Tablet Market Requirements Have Totally Changed

By leveraging the iPhone and iTunes to differentiate from other eReader products, Apple has completely changed the dynamics of both the eReader and the tablet computing marketplaces.

  • eReader vendors like Amazon and Sony are competing with a product that does far more than just read electronic documents at high resolution.  The iPad is differentiated by their 185,000 apps and the power of the iTunes environment.
  • Tablet computer vendors like HP and Dell have seen the game change overnight.  Competition in the space used to be about putting a version of Windows on a small portable device.  Now, Apple has put new requirements on the industry that will be hard to respond to:
    • High resolution screen
    • Touch interface
    • Powerful online support with apps, music, podcasts
    • Long battery life
    • Quick response time (from a very lean OS)

Apple made a smart move in using the iPhone as the platform for the iPad.  Most if not all iPhone applications automatically run on the iPad.  The problem is that all of them were built to work with the small display size of the iPhone.  Apple dealt with that problem by adding a “2X” function that just doubles the display size of apps – and instantly almost all iPhone apps look bigger on an iPad.

HP Tablet Computer Options

The timing of this announcement is interesting in terms of the options before HP.  They clearly want to be a major player in the tablet computing space.  The problem is that Apple has completely  changed the market requirements for every vendor in the space.  HP’s strategic options:

  • Keep working with Windows 7 and try to get it right. HP has been a loyal strategic partner of Microsoft and going another direction might damage a very successful partnership.  However, it does not look like Windows 7 can compete in this space as it is now defined.
  • Move to Google Android.   It’s open.  It’s free to use.  They could leverage the Google application community.  This would seem to make a lot of sense except for…
  • Palm webOS.  HP just paid $1.2 Billion for Palm, so it’s hard to imagine them going in any other direction with their tablet computers.  iPhone/iPad and Android are gaining a lot of market momentum and developer support.  HP will have a lot of ground to make up in a short time.

General Observations

  • Apple has done an amazing job of disrupting the eReader business by extending the functionality of their product with iPhone/iTunes capabilities.
  • In the process, Apple has apparently also disrupted the Tablet PC market.  Two adjacent markets with one stone.  Amazing.
  • Product requirements:  Everybody building Tablet PCs was thinking in terms of smaller Wintel products until a couple of months ago.  The lesson to learn is: Listen to your customers problems, not how your customers think they should be solved.

Full disclosure: I am often critical of Apple for being proprietary, but I have to give them top ratings for innovation and strategy here.  This is an example of product strategy that will live on in MBA school case studies for a long time to come.

Other Articles on HP Scrapping their Tablet

CNN Money

Reuters








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 97 other followers