Advice for Software Startups 2011

16 12 2010

As we head into 2011, the business picture for startups is continuing to improve steadily.  Around San Francisco and Silicon Valley, the startup “buzz” is reaching levels not seen in a long time.  Funding continues to grow, cautiously. The cost of launching a startup is falling.  The end game remains a bit cloudy: The vast majority of startups plan to exit by selling themselves to a larger company.  Here are my thoughts for 2011, with a particular emphasis on software startups.  (See also Silicon Valley Startup Investing Trends blog posting.)

Start With Non-traditional Funding. Angel funding in particular are gaining strength and with the lower financial barriers to getting a startup going, in many cases the Angel round can be enough for many startups to achieve escape velocity.  Also consider the investment arms of larger companies.  This is particularly true in CleanTech and BioTech but there are large companies that will invest in software startups as well.  VC funding is out there, but you need to have a running application with a vibrant and active community before seeking funding.

Build & Deploy in the Cloud. Startups can build and deploy  services in the cloud for much less up-front money.  Using platforms such as Amazon EC2, Salesforce.com, Heroku (acquired), Google, IBM, and even Facebook. The financial benefits  of the cloud will mean a much lower barrier to entry for new companies.  It has gotten to the point where nobody in their right mind would fund a startup that built their own datacenter.  Even if your plan is to have your own data center for competitive differentiation reasons, it still makes sense to start on the cloud first, test the viability of your idea, and then invest further.

Have a Plan to be #1 or #2 or Forget It. Geoffrey Moore spelled this out in his book, The Gorilla Game and it has never been more true.  With the speed of Internet innovation and the lowered barriers to entry, markets mature and consolidate faster than ever before.  The only companies who typically make money are the top two players.  Special exception: Sometimes it is possible to carve out a profitable niche market and defend it.  Think hard about the barriers to entry are in this market and prepare to defend them if this is the path you chose.  Niche Example: Security products and services in the U.S. Medical market requires specific  expertise in HIPAA privacy rules.

Solve a Specific Problem for a Specific  Customer. A lot of people are in love with the idea of “ship it, listen to your customers, and iterate.” That approach only works if you are the market innovator or a market leader.  In a crowded market  or when you are coming from behind, that approach does not work.  You must have a clear business value proposition and clear market differentiation to separate you from the rest of the pack.  Actually, that is good advice for every startup.  Example: Zynga found specific and unmet customer needs around social gaming.

Plan Your “End Game” Carefully. IPOs remain unlikely in the current economic conditions for all but the very most successful startups (Groupon, for example).

  • Be clear about what your end game is.  If it is to sell to a larger company, make sure that this is built into your business plan, that your core team knows it, and this goal is prioritized correctly.
  • Be clear about who your target buyers are and how you plan to position your startup to them.
  • Never only have one target buyer.  You always need a backup plan, even if it is just for bargaining leverage.  When you say you are willing to walk away from the table, you had better be willing to do just that – which means you have to have a Plan B.

Have a Community Plan.  Most startups with a social element to the offer will have some aspect of community to them.  The question is, where will you get your community?

  • Build Your Own: This is very hard to do if you are trying to build a large generalized community.  Even Google is struggling with this.
  • Specialize: Some topics are not for everybody to hear.  There may be ways to build community for specialized topics like neurosurgery, cloud computing, or startups. The challenge will be to offer a significant enough incentive to make it worth people’s time to create another online identity and profile.
  • Borrow One: You can build your service on the Facebook platform, for example.  This gives you an instant community of 600 million users, but comes with significant constraints and risks.

People Count. A lot of startups I talk to spend all their time thinking about innovative and cool ideas.  That’s a good start but, when it comes to getting Series A or Series B funding, the quality of your core team count for as much or more than your business idea.  Why is that?  See the next item below.

Listen & Iterate. Lots of startups launch, listen to their customers, and find out that they need to change their business direction.  Sometimes radically. Thanks to Agile Development techniques (example: SCRUM) and cloud platforms, many startups are able to make the changes required if they are listening to their customers.  The good news is that customers will happily tell you what they want and where you are screwing up, if you listen.  Social media makes that customer interaction even faster and more powerful.  Your customers generally will want you to succeed and will try to help you to do so.  Another key lesson here is not to go too far down the path on v2.0 until you have listened to and completely internalized the customer feedback from v1.0.  Everybody in your organization has to be listening after the release of v1.0 — and that includes the development team.

Low Barriers to Entry for You Means the Same For Your Competition. The good news is that you can get your startup operating and competing for a lot less capital investment.  The bad news is that your competitors can too.  So, the question is: How are you going to stay out in front of them?

  • Out-grow: Grow faster than your competitors and leave no breathing room in your target market.  For example: Facebook is in a dominant position just because of the sheer size of their community.  Users are fatigued with creating and managing multiple online profiles.  A startup that asks users to create a new one is facing a serious uphill battle in 2011. That does even for a competitor as powerful as Google.
  • Out-innovate. Listen to customers better, and provide more value that way.
  • Specialize: Carve out a niche and defend it by catering to the specific needs of the market.

Partner. There are a lot of good reasons to partner. The important thing is that if you are serious about the partnership then you have to staff them.  Partnerships managed by busy people in their “spare time” almost never work out.  Partnership goals include:

  • Whole Products: Partners can help you to fill in the gaps in your product and deliver a “whole product” or solution to your target customer, not just technology.
  • Apparent size: Small fish swim in schools to look like a bigger entity to larger predators. Partnering can make you look more viable.
  • Ideas: Partnering with other startups can help just through shared experience and ideas.
  • Market Access: Larger partners can help you get into markets. Just don’t look at them as sales channels for your products.  You have to bring value to the table and that usually means qualified customer leads and/or a way to make their products more competitive in the marketplace.
  • Your End Game: Build a relationship that may grow into something deeper.  Like acquisition. In many cases, it makes sense to partner first to test out the relationship before buying the company.

Right now, most of the software startup action is in social media and mobile applications.  That doesn’t mean there isn’t opportunity elsewhere, it is just that the path of least funding resistance is here.  With all the “action” concentrated in this space, it makes it all the more important to have clear market differentiation.

A couple of years ago, the advice to software startups would have been to develop offshore (to reduce costs) and to open source your software (to position it as open).  These two things are no longer flat requirements  for funding but can be useful tactics if they make sense for your business.

Best Wishes for 2011!





Silicon Valley Startup Investing & Trends 2011

3 12 2010

Last night I attended a panel discussion on “Technology, Startup, Investing Trends & Forecasts for 2011 – Where Are We Headed?” put on by the Silicon  Valley Association of Startup Entrepreneurs (SVASE). There were well over 100 people in attendance, showing that there is a good deal of startup activity going on.

Venture Capital investment is increasing as are the overall levels of optimism and innovation.  At the same time, there is a degree of caution about the world economy in general.  Funding is available for good startup ideas, but the most likely exit plan will be by acquisition.  Here are some of the highlights of the discussion as it relates to Internet and Software startups.

The General State of VC Funding

  • “2008 was the scariest economic event most of us will witness in our lifetimes”
  • We are seeing slow, steady improvement in VC funding since then.  2011 will continue this steady improvement.
  • All on the panel were cautiously optimistic about 2011
  • Interesting Observation: The top 20% of VCs are so busy doing deals that “it is hard to even get them on the phone.”  The other 80% of VCs are doing virtually nothing.  (How much longer will these funds be around?)

The State of Silicon Valley for Entrepreneurs

  • The level of innovation continues to be high
  • There is increasing optimism among investors and entrepreneurs
  • California remains the best area for VC funding
    • $18 billion in funding in 2009.  (-35%)
    • $16 billion in funding ytd 2010.  Should be a modest up year.
  • Corporate funding of startups may be exceeding VC funding.  A lot of money is coming from “Big Oil” and “Big Pharma”
  • The public markets are less rosy.  The IPO market is all but dead.  Most startups are targeting a buyout as their end game.  Very few companies are thinking of IPOs.
    • NASDAQ is at a three year high.  Can it last?
    • S&P is at a two year high.
    • But, very few companies are going public
  • The startups that will be able to do IPOs will have “Great Stories” and powerful strategic partners.  Examples:
    • Tesla
    • DNA Resequencing startups
    • “Swing for the Fence” Ideas: Continuous glucose monitoring, artificial organs, anti-ageing.
  • We are seeing faster time to “Big Companies.”  Example:
    • HP                          Decades
    • Google                 10 years
    • Twitter                 4 years
    • Groupon              1 year

The Best Cities in the US to Find a Job

  • #1 is Washington DC   (much laughter about this one)
  • #2 is San Jose

Angel Funding Observations

  • Angel funding is increasingly important.  There are examples of companies going straight from Angel funds to sale of the company without a stop at “traditional” VC funding.
  • The cost of startups is declining.  They can do more with less funding: Capital efficiency.
  • Startups are able to get significantly more market traction before VC funding (and VCs are requiring this to get funding)
  • Two types of Angels:
    • Individual Angels.  Potentially the most helpful if they get directly and passionately involved in the startup.
    • Institutional Angels.
  • Suggestion for finding Angel investors: Go the cocktail events held by PR firms.

Comments on Internet and Software Startups

  • Most of the funding action is in Consumer Internet.  The panel saw social media as fundamentally changing the way consumers buy things.  This makes a lot of current software applications and site ripe for disruption.
  • Most of what can be done with operating systems, networking and enterprise software has been done.  (Doesn’t this sound a bit like proposing to close the Patent Office because everything that could be invented has already been invented?)

What VCs Are Looking For When Making Funding Decisions

This is a collection of responses from multiple panel members.

  • 10x value differentiation
  • A startup that is leveraging a technology shift to disrupt a Big market
  • Innovation
  • The chance to disrupt really big markets
  • People.  The team really matters.
  • Sustained community engagement with the service and ability to go viral
  • Quick time-to-value for users
  • The service must fulfill users emotional needs of their users
  • Cool technology and compelling content will not cut it.

The Panel

  • Matt Hemington, Cooley LLP, Moderator
  • James Cham, Trinity Ventures
  • Ari Levy, Bloomberg News
  • Todd Kimmell, Mayfield Fund
  • Bipul Sinha, Lightspeed Ventures
  • John Steuart, Claremont Creek Ventures

Note: My notes are focused on software and the Internet.  There was also considerable discussion of biotech, green tech and energy that I have not covered in this blog.





Social Media Marketing at Ford

5 11 2010

This is a follow-up to an earlier blog that I wrote about Ford and social media marketing.  They are continuing to do some great things over there.

The Ford Fiesta Movement

Ford launched the Ford Fiesta in this country entirely with social media marketing campaign called the Ford Fiesta Movement.

  • Ford gave 100 Fiestas to online personalities free for six months
  • The personalities were challenged to a contest where they got points for creating online content about the cars
  • Results at the time of launch
    • Over six million YouTube views
    • 740,000 Flickr images
    • 3.7 Twitter impressions
    • 80,000 people asked for more information about the Fiesta – and 97% had never owned a Ford before.
    • 40% Generation Y awareness

All this was done with zero traditional media.  It was a 100% social marketing campaign.

Ford Social Media Marketing Video

(This is really worth watching — all the way through)

Ford is not stopping there

The video here talks about how Ford is now doing a Focus Rally America event for the Ford Focus.

Here’s how Focus Rally America works (and this is creative):

  • Ford will select six teams of two people to compete in an interactive cross-country road rally.
  • The winner gets $100,000 plus 10 Ford Focus cars to give away to the people who help them the most online.
  • Clues to navigating the rally will be published online and the community will have to pick teams and support them by helping them to solve the clues.

Scott Monty, goes on to describe how Ford is using social media as a part of integrated marketing campaigns that have far more impact than traditional marketing campaigns.  These campaigns include

  • Paid media
  • Earned media
  • Owned media

The key to success, as he describes it so well, is: “It’s people talking to people about Ford, not Ford talking to people about Ford.”

The other important thing to take away from this is that Ford is generating user and interest and buzz without being gimmicky, in my opinion.  This is a fun way to generate genuine interest in their products.





Android Continues Gaining Market Share on Apple iOS

4 11 2010

This quarter’s numbers are in and they show that the Android platform is outgrowing Apple iOS in the battle for the smartphone market.  Check out the Platform numbers in the latest comScore Mobile report.

comScore September Mobile Numbers

Google has claimed in a number of forums that they are turning on 200,000 new Android phones per day.  Eric Schmidt has been quoted as saying that Apple is “only” turning on 90,000 iPhones per day.  Nielsen says that Google is capturing 27% of the new mobile phone users.

Google article.

It doesn’t take much math to figure out who is gaining market share here.  For the June – Sept period, Google gained market share and RIM, Microsoft, Apple and Palm were all flat or down.

So, why does this matter?

  • Market share leadership means apps are developed for your platform first.
  • Leaders get first choice in strategic partnerships with other companies.
  • Leaders get approached first with new ideas and proposals.
  • In summary: Who will get to be the center of innovation for smartphones
  • And, of course, bragging rights.

Does all of this sound eerily familiar?  It should.  So far, we are tracking the same business model strategy path that we saw before with Mac versus WinTel PC.

The one thing that seems remarkably different this time around is that we are seeing both Apple and Google driving innovation on the mobile platform into their desktop functionality.  Apple “gestures” moving to Mac.  Google moving Android features to Chrome OS.

Disclosure: After months of waiting and watching I recently purchased a Droid.

 





Google Me Coming this Fall

1 10 2010

Eric Schmidt has confirmed that “Google Me” is not just a rumor.  It is coming “sometime this fall.”  Google Me has been described as a social layer that is integrated with their current offerings such as Search, YouTube, and Google Maps.

Google’s intent with Google Me is to allow users to access information and profiles that they have created on other sites such as Twitter, Flickr, and others.  They are also trying to get access to the data on Facebook.

Google is also looking to partner with some of the big game companies on Facebook.  They have said that they will integrate with Zynga and have a stake in the company.

These rumors have been confirmed in:

Reuters

WSJ (you will need to read down a bit in this article)

What’s driving Google

  • First of all, social media is hot and Google needs to be a part of it to continue to be a leader in the online world.  Google’s Orkut has only been successful in Brazil and India and Google Wave was killed last month.  Google has learned from both experiences and will incorporate that learning into their approach with Google Me.
  • Social Media is an opaque world to search, the core of Google’s business. As more activity moves to Social Media, Google is getting left out.  With Facebook at 500 million users, the strategic threat is significant.
  • Advertising.  This is the core of Google’s revenue stream.  As we have discussed in the two previous blogs on this site, the growth rate for search ad revenue is slowing while it increases in display ads, particularly banner ads and video ads.  Google’s model is to place ads within the context of what users are doing.  As they lose visibility to user activity online, they lose the ability to place useful ads and their overall relevance decreases.

Google’s strategic need for Google Me is clear.  The details remain to be seen.  The key issue is how Google gets over the hurdle of the 500 million Facebook users.  This is a classic “barrier to entry” in the social media space.  Users do not want to build and manage multiple online presences and profiles.  Can Google deliver a service that:

  • Fits naturally with the way people work and interact online
  • Provides significant value to users over and above what they have today
  • Allows users to leverage existing network relationships without having to re-build them on another site
  • Respects people’s privacy.  Google has had troubles in this area such as the way they implemented Google Buzz and Street View.
  • Aggregates many different online activities in one place, making it easier for people to manage their virtual lives

We should not have to wait too long to see.








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.